Skills
Browse curated AI skills for development, design, testing, and more.
Browse curated AI skills for development, design, testing, and more.
Showing 49-70 of 70

@CSlawyer1985
Guided customization of your privacy practice profile — change one thing without re-running the whole cold-start interview. Adjust risk posture, escalation contacts, DPA playbook, privacy policy commitments, PIA house style, DSAR process, or matter workspace paths. Use when the user says "change my [thing]", "update my profile", "edit my playbook", or "customize".

@CSlawyer1985
将新出台或变更的法规与现行个人信息处理规则及实践进行差异对比——输出差距清单和 附负责人和日期的整改计划。当新法规出台,用户问"[某法规]影响我们吗""[某法规] 差距分析""对照[法规]进行合规检查",或粘贴法规文本时使用。

@CSlawyer1985
冷启动访谈——建立你的监管监测清单、索引政策库并了解你的重要度阈值,使监测器输出信号而非噪音。适用于全新安装、重新配置时(--redo),或重新检查哪些连接器实际响应时(--check-integrations)。

@CSlawyer1985
快速判断某项处理活动是否需要个人信息保护影响评估、是否触发个保法第55条法定评估义务, 或可直接推进——同时排查个人信息处理规则冲突并路由至正确的下一步。当用户询问"这个需 要做PIA吗""对这个功能做隐私分诊""对X做隐私检查""从隐私角度看这个行不行",或描述一 项新的个人信息处理活动、产品功能或供应商关系时使用。

@CSlawyer1985
管理事项工作空间——新建、列表、切换、关闭或脱钩(实务级)。 当您为多个客户或事项工作、需要创建、列出、切换、关闭或脱钩活跃事项 以防一个委托事项的上下文泄漏到另一个时使用。

@CSlawyer1985
检查法规动态源,报告自上次检查以来的新事项,按重要度阈值过滤。适用于用户说"检查法规动态"、"有什么新规定"、"法规更新"、从定时任务触发执行,或手动粘贴法规动态进行分类和差异分析时。

@CSlawyer1985
保持个人信息处理规则与实践一致。两种模式:周度扫描已保存的PIA、DPA审查和分诊结果以 发现处理规则漂移;或针对拟议的新实践进行直接查询。当用户问"我们的处理规则覆盖这个吗" "我们想开始做X——处理规则需要更新吗""运行处理规则监控""处理规则扫描",或想找到处理 规则不再匹配团队实际操作的地方时使用。

@CSlawyer1985
对产品法务实务画像进行引导式定制——修改单项设置,无需重新运行完整冷启动访谈。 调整风险校准、上报联系人、上线审查框架、营销宣传立场或事项工作空间路径。当用户说 "修改我的[某项设置]""更新我的画像""编辑我的框架""重调我的校准"或"定制"时使用。

@CSlawyer1985
生成符合内部格式的个人信息保护影响评估(PIA),适用于新功能、产品或处理活动, 使用从种子PIA学习到的结构。当用户说"写一份PIA""个人信息保护影响评估""我们需要 为这个做PIA吗""对这个功能做隐私审查",或描述一项新的个人信息处理活动时使用。

@CSlawyer1985
按系统逐一定义AI角色、风险等级和监管义务——判定每个系统是 AI服务提供者还是使用者,分配风险层级,并映射至中国AI法规 的义务要求。适用于建立AI系统清单、进行年度AI审计、或新法 规要求重新分类时。

@CSlawyer1985
将新的或修订的AI法规与当前AI政策和实践进行差异分析—— 输出差距清单和整改计划,含负责人和日期。适用于新法规 出台、用户询问"[某法规]是否影响我们"、" AI法规差距分析"或粘贴法规文本时。

@CSlawyer1985
运行冷启动访谈——学习你的隐私实践并从你的处理规则、DPA模板和一份参考PIA写入 CLAUDE.md。在首次运行、CLAUDE.md缺失或有占位符、或用户说"设置隐私插件" "引导我""配置隐私"",或想重新运行访谈或重新检查集成时使用。

@CSlawyer1985
保持AI使用政策与当前实践一致。两种模式:每周扫描已保存的AI 评估和分类结果以发现政策漂移;或对提议的新实践进行直接查询。 适用于用户询问"我们的AI政策是否覆盖了这一点"、"我们想 开始做X——政策需要更新吗"、"运行AI政策监测"、"政策扫描" 或需要发现AI政策与实际操作不符之处时。

@CSlawyer1985
指导式定制监管实践配置——在不重新运行完整冷启动访谈的情况下对单项进行调整。 调整监管机构监测清单、政策库索引、重要度阈值、差距响应流程、 动态源配置或事务工作区路径。适用于用户说"改我的[某配置]"、"增加一个监管机构"、 "更新我的监测清单"、"编辑阈值"或"定制"时。

@CSlawyer1985
为AI系统或模型生成风险定级和合规概要评估——涵盖数据、公平性、 透明度、安全性和监管注册表。在用例分类为"附条件-高"后使用, 产品或工程团队提出"我们需要做AI影响评估"时使用,或定期重新 认证已部署系统时使用。采用快速/全面双轨制。

@anthropics
Deeper risk assessment for a single feature or product area when the launch review found something that needs more than a line item. Structured analysis: what could go wrong, how likely, how bad, what mitigates it. Use when user says "deep dive on this risk", "risk assessment for [feature]", "what could go wrong with", or when launch-review flags a novel issue.

@anthropics
EU AI Act per-system inventory — track each AI system's role (provider, deployer, importer, distributor, authorized representative, product manufacturer) and risk tier (prohibited, high-risk, limited, minimal, GPAI, GPAI+systemic). Role and tier are assessed per system, not per company. Use when the user says "ai inventory", "add an ai system", "what systems do we have", "classify this ai system", "eu ai act register", or "ai system registry".

@anthropics
Produce a proposed marked-up policy redraft that closes a gap found by /regulatory-legal:gaps or /regulatory-legal:policy-diff. A first draft for internal review — not for direct application to approved policy documents. Use when the user says "redraft the policy", "draft the policy fix", "mark up the policy", or when gap-surfacer hands off a gap for drafting.

@anthropics
Review open NPRM comment periods, log decisions, track deadlines. Use when an NPRM has a comment window open and you need to surface deadlines, decide whether to file, or record a filing / not-filing / waived decision (--decide CMT-ID).

@anthropics
Diff a specific regulatory change against the indexed policy library. Use when a reg has changed and you need to know which policies it touches and what the gap is, when the user says "diff this reg against our policies", "which policy does this affect", or "gap analysis", or when reg-feed-watcher hands off a material item.

@anthropics
Guided customization of your privacy practice profile — change one thing without re-running the whole cold-start interview. Adjust risk posture, escalation contacts, DPA playbook, privacy policy commitments, PIA house style, DSAR process, or matter workspace paths. Use when the user says "change my [thing]", "update my profile", "edit my playbook", or "customize".

@anthropics
Classify a proposed AI use case against your registry — approved, conditional, or not approved — and produce required conditions and next steps. Flags cross-plugin handoffs to privacy or product counsel. Use when user says "triage this use case", "can we use AI for X", "is this approved", "what do we need to do to use AI for X".