
About
AI-native lead intelligence and outreach pipeline. Replaces Apollo, Clay, and ZoomInfo with agent-powered signal scoring, mutual ranking, warm path discovery, source-derived voice modeling, and channel-specific outreach across email, LinkedIn, and X. Use when the user wants to find, qualify, and rea
name: lead-intelligence description: AI-native lead intelligence and outreach pipeline. Replaces Apollo, Clay, and ZoomInfo with agent-powered signal scoring, mutual ranking, warm path discovery, source-derived voice modeling, and channel-specific outreach across email, LinkedIn, and X. Use when the user wants to find, qualify, and reach high-value contacts. origin: ECC
Lead Intelligence
Agent-powered lead intelligence pipeline that finds, scores, and reaches high-value contacts through social graph analysis and warm path discovery.
When to Activate
- User wants to find leads or prospects in a specific industry
- Building an outreach list for partnerships, sales, or fundraising
- Researching who to reach out to and the best path to reach them
- User says "find leads", "outreach list", "who should I reach out to", "warm intros"
- Needs to score or rank a list of contacts by relevance
- Wants to map mutual connections to find warm introduction paths
Tool Requirements
Required
- Exa MCP — Deep web search for people, companies, and signals (
web_search_exa) - X API — Follower/following graph, mutual analysis, recent activity (
X_BEARER_TOKEN, plus write-context credentials such asX_CONSUMER_KEY,X_CONSUMER_SECRET,X_ACCESS_TOKEN,X_ACCESS_TOKEN_SECRET)
Optional (enhance results)
- LinkedIn — Direct API if available, otherwise browser control for search, profile inspection, and drafting
- Apollo/Clay API — For enrichment cross-reference if user has access
- GitHub MCP — For developer-centric lead qualification
- Apple Mail / Mail.app — Draft cold or warm email without sending automatically
- Browser control — For LinkedIn and X when API coverage is missing or constrained
Pipeline Overview
┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ 1. Signal │────>│ 2. Mutual │────>│ 3. Warm Path │────>│ 4. Enrich │────>│ 5. Outreach │
│ Scoring │ │ Ranking │ │ Discovery │ │ │ │ Draft │
└─────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └─────────────────┘
Voice Before Outreach
Do not draft outbound from generic sales copy.
Run brand-voice first whenever the user's voice matters. Reuse its VOICE PROFILE instead of re-deriving style ad hoc inside this skill.
If live X access is available, pull recent original posts before drafting. If not, use supplied examples or the best repo/site material available.
Stage 1: Signal Scoring
Search for high-signal people in target verticals. Assign a weight to each based on:
| Signal | Weight | Source | |--------|--------|--------| | Role/title alignment | 30% | Exa, LinkedIn | | Industry match | 25% | Exa company search | | Recent activity on topic | 20% | X API search, Exa | | Follower count / influence | 10% | X API | | Location proximity | 10% | Exa, LinkedIn | | Engagement with your content | 5% | X API interactions |
Signal Search Approach
# Step 1: Define target parameters
target_verticals = ["prediction markets", "AI tooling", "developer tools"]
target_roles = ["founder", "CEO", "CTO", "VP Engineering", "investor", "partner"]
target_locations = ["San Francisco", "New York", "London", "remote"]
# Step 2: Exa deep search for people
for vertical in target_verticals:
results = web_search_exa(
query=f"{vertical} {role} founder CEO",
category="company",
numResults=20
)
# Score each result
# Step 3: X API search for active voices
x_search = search_recent_tweets(
query="prediction markets OR AI tooling OR developer tools",
max_results=100
)
# Extract and score unique authors
Stage 2: Mutual Ranking
For each scored target, analyze the user's social graph to find the warmest path.
Ranking Model
- Pull user's X following list and LinkedIn connections
- For each high-signal target, check for shared connections
- Apply the
social-graph-rankermodel to score bridge value - Rank mutuals by:
| Factor | Weight | |--------|--------| | Number of connections to targets | 40% — highest weight, most connections = highest rank | | Mutual's current role/company | 20% — decision maker vs individual contributor | | Mutual's location | 15% — same city = easier intro | | Industry alignment | 15% — same vertical = natural intro | | Mutual's X handle / LinkedIn | 10% — identifiability for outreach |
Canonical rule:
Use social-graph-ranker when the user wants the graph math itself,
the bridge ranking as a standalone report, or explicit decay-model tuning.
Inside this skill, use the same weighted bridge model:
B(m) = Σ_{t ∈ T} w(t) · λ^(d(m,t) - 1)
R(m) = B_ext(m) · (1 + β · engagement(m))
Interpretation:
- Tier 1: high
R(m)and direct bridge paths -> warm intro asks - Tier 2: medium
R(m)and one-hop bridge paths -> conditional intro asks
